Martin v. State
Martin v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant is not entitled to credit for time served in various probation and restitution centers. See Smith v. State, 619 So.2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Turner v. State, 395 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). However, the judgment must be corrected to reflect conviction of a third-degree felony rather than a second-degree felony. Finally, the trial court erroneously revoked appellant’s probation and sentenced him to time served on a misdemeanor offense for which the sixty-day probationary term had expired. The judgment should also be corrected to so re-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.