Mathis v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Mathis v. State, 680 So. 2d 633 (1996)
1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10935; 1996 WL 590781
Dell, Gross, Stone

Mathis v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. However, as in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we certify to the supreme court the following question as one of great public importance:

IS STATE V. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1995) RETROACTIVE?

AFFIRMED.

DELL, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Prentice MATHIS v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published