Alexander v. State
Alexander v. State
680 So. 2d 635; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10932; 1996 WL 590792
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Alexander v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm defendant’s convictions for armed robbery and dealing in stolen property, but remand the latter for resentencing. The sentencing scoresheet erroneously listed defendant’s armed robbery conviction, for which he was sentenced as a habitual offender, as the primary offense. See Ricardo v. State, 608 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.