Caraway v. State
Caraway v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm Bobby E. Caraway’s judgments and sentences for two counts of lewd act in the presence of a child and two counts of engaging a child in sexual activity. We also affirm condition 5 prohibiting Mr. Caraway from using intoxicants to excess. State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla. 1996). Oral pronouncement of this general condition of probation is not required. We strike the portion of condition 8 requiring Mr. Caraway to pay for random drug testing because it is
Affirmed as modified.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.