Gomez v. State
Gomez v. State
681 So. 2d 933; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395; 1996 WL 625927
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gomez v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of collateral sex crimes where both the charged offenses and the collateral crimes occurred in a familial setting and where the collateral crimes were sufficiently similar to the charged offenses. See Saffor v. State, 660 So.2d 668, 672 (Fla. 1995); Shipman v. State, 668 So.2d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.