Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Odom v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 4, 1996 · No. 96-2009 · Dauksch, Goshorn, Griffin

682 So. 2d 572; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10364; 1996 WL 563354 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Brown v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The lower court’s summary denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief is affirmed except as to the claim that the habitual offender, sentences were improperly made to run consecutive to each other. Appellant has asserted the offenses arose from a single criminal episode. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993). The lower court must either attach portions of the record refuting the claim, conduct a hearing on the claim, or grant relief.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.