Zito v. State
Zito v. State
682 So. 2d 675; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11648; 1996 WL 637668
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Zito v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. However, as in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we certify to the supreme court the following question as-oné of great public importance:
IS STATE V. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1995) RETROACTIVE?
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.