Prestridge v. State
Prestridge v. State
682 So. 2d 703; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11945; 1996 WL 661775
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Prestridge v. State
Opinion of the Court
As the State properly concedes, the sentences imposed on the defendant pursuant to the plea agreement of October 31, 1995, do not include credit for the prison time the defendant had previously served, and a motion to correct illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, was the appropriate vehicle to seek the correction of the trial court’s order.
Thus, the trial court erred in denying the pro se timely filed 3.800 motion. The cause
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.