Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Tate v. State

Tate v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 27, 1996 · Blue, Frank, Lazzara
683 So. 2d 626; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12458; 1996 WL 681072 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tate v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentences. We strike, however, the words “to pay for” from condition 8 of the orders of probation because that portion is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed as modified.

FRANK, A.C.J., and BLUE and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑