W.D. challenges the trial court’s oral pronouncement that he be placed in boot camp. Although the trial judge stated at the disposition hearing that he was committing W.D. to a level six placement for boot camp commitment, the written order simply commits the child to the Department of Juvenile Justice for a level six placement. We affirm the written order because boot camp placement is not authorized for petit theft. See § 39.057(3)(a) and (b), Fla.Stat. (1993).

The written order of the trial court committing the child to a level six restriction is hereby affirmed.