Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

State v. Marshall

State v. Marshall
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 26, 1996 · Goderich, Green, Nesbitt
684 So. 2d 343; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13442; 1996 WL 734844 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Marshall

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court properly granted the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of a post-indictment lineup where such lineup was a critical stage of the prosecution during which, absent an intelligent waiver, the defendant was entitled to have counsel present. U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926,18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.