Castro v. State
Castro v. State
685 So. 2d 27; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12332; 1996 WL 670551
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Castro v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s three convictions under section 316.193(3)(c)l, Florida Statutes (1993). State v. Salazar, 679 So.2d 1183, (Fla. 1996); Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759, (Fla. 1996). We reverse that portion of the written order' of probation which indicates that appellant may perform community service in lieu of costs of supervision. E.g., Royster v. State, 657 So.2d 36 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for the entry of an amended order of probation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.