Simonetta v. State
Simonetta v. State
Opinion of the Court
In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation, and the sentence imposed. However, we note that it does not appear that a written order was entered revoking appellant’s probation. On remand, the trial court is directed to enter a written order, consistent with its oral pronouncement, revoking appellant’s probation, and specifying the condition of probation found to have been violated. Appellant need not be present.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.