Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Henke v. State

Henke v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 1, 1996 · Danahy, Lazzara, Whatley
686 So. 2d 11; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4555; 1996 WL 210895 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Henke v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words “at your own expense” from *12condition 10. Luhy v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed as modified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑