Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1996

Iengo v. State

Iengo v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 5, 1996 · Frank, Lazzara, Threadgill
686 So. 2d 13; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5915; 1996 WL 293785 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Iengo v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words “at your own expense” from condition 10 for the same reason. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed as modified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑