Gomez v. State
Gomez v. State
686 So. 2d 19; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6859; 1996 WL 354618
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gomez v. State
Opinion of the Court
Pedro Gomez argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in ordering restitution more than 60 days after entry of the original judgment and sentence, which did not include restitution. We agree. See State v. Sanderson, 626 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1993). Accordingly, the restitution orders are vacated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.