Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Beauford v. State

Beauford v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 24, 1997 · Per Curiam
689 So. 2d 320; 1997 WL 24593 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Beauford v. State

Opinion

689 So.2d 320 (1997)

Shironald BEAUFORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-3066.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 24, 1997.
Rehearing Denied March 6, 1997.

Shironald Beauford, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's summary denial of Beauford's second Rule 3.850 motion[1]. Beauford is barred from raising issues which could or should have been raised in his first Rule 3.850 motion. This one attempts to do that and thus it is successive and improper. See Henry v. State, 679 So.2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Scott v. State, 656 So.2d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑