Dawkins v. State
Dawkins v. State
686 So. 2d 756; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 117; 1997 WL 12931
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dawkins v. State
Opinion of the Court
We find no merit in the issues Lamaise Dawkins raises concerning the lower court’s denial of his motion to suppress, the term of probation it imposed and the conditions of probation. We, therefore, affirm these points without discussion. We strike the trial court’s assessment of a $15.00 fee for the court improvement fund. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We remand for the lower court to modify the order of probation accordingly.
Affirmed in part, cost stricken and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.