James v. State
James v. State
687 So. 2d 364; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 954; 1997 WL 55689
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
James v. State
Opinion of the Court
Because the State’s justifications for peremptorily challenging the prospective jurors were facially race-neutral and genuine, we affirm. See State v. Holiday, 682 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1996); Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996).
Affirmed..
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.