Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Reeder v. State

Reeder v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 5, 1997 · Lawrence, Padovano, Webster
688 So. 2d 458; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1815; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 630 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Reeder v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s summary denial of Appellant’s rule 3.800 motion is affirmed. The motion does not allege that the trial court imposed a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum, as contemplated in Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1995), but instead challenges the legality of Appellant’s conviction *459under State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1995). A claim such as this must be presented in a sworn motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850. We express no opinion on the merits of the claim.

Affirmed.

WEBSTER, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑