McNabb v. State
McNabb v. State
689 So. 2d 371; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359; 1997 WL 68048
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
McNabb v. State
Opinion of the Court
Having considered the various arguments presented by the appellant in this direct criminal appeal, we affirm his convictions. We reject his argument pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), because the record is insufficient to show that peremptory challenges were exercised. See Ganyard v. State, 686 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.