Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Estrada v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 21, 1997 · Campbell, Lazzara, Whatley

689 So. 2d 372; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1398; 1997 WL 71744 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bartley v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Paleno Estrada, challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. After a review of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the defendant’s conviction. We strike, however, that portion of probation condition 9 requiring Mr. Estrada to pay for random drug and alcohol testing because it is a special condition that was not orally announced at sentencing. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We affirm the sentence in all other respects.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.