ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We affirm the appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence. However, since the fourth issue on appeal raises the same legal question which this court certified to the *1122supreme court in Young v. State, 678 So.2d 427 (Pla. 4th DCA 1996), review granted, 687 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 1997), we certify the same question here.

IS A DEPENDANT ENTITLED TO CREDIT POR TIME SPENT ON PROBATION/COMMUNITY CONTROL WHEN A NEW SENTENCE OF INCARCERATION IS IMPOSED FOR VIOLATION OF THE PROBATIONARY PORTION OF A SPLIT SENTENCE AND THE NEW PERIOD OF INCARCERATION, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE PROBATION/COMMUNITY CONTROL PREVIOUSLY SERVED, EXCEEDS THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR THE CRIME CHARGED?

FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

AFFIRMED.