John H. Swisher & Son v. Scantling
John H. Swisher & Son v. Scantling
690 So. 2d 635; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1814; 1997 WL 90821
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
John H. Swisher & Son v. Scantling
Opinion of the Court
The judge of compensation claims correctly imposed attorney’s fees against appellants as a sanction due to their failure to comply with the judge’s prior order approving the parties’ agreement that appellants would pay certain medical bills, which remained unpaid. See Fla. R. Work. Comp. 4.150; § 440.33(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). Cf. Horizon Healthcare v. Murphy, 660 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.