Bright v. State
Bright v. State
691 So. 2d 594; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3907; 1997 WL 178911
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bright v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the order by which the trial court denied the appellant’s Florida rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. The purported claims of newly discovered evidence of prosecutorial misconduct were properly denied because they were legally insufficient to state colorable claims. The remaining claims were properly denied as successive.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.