Kapuscinski v. State
Kapuscinski v. State
693 So. 2d 122; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4974; 1997 WL 232259
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Kapuscinski v. State
Opinion of the Court
Mark Kapuscinski has appealed from the denial of his motion to suppress, which we affirm. He has further contended, and the state has conceded, that the court erred in imposing costs of $105.00 without citation to statutory authority. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we reverse the costs order and remand. The state may seek reimposition of the costs with reference to the proper authority. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
Affirmed in part and remanded for further proceedings.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.