Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 2, 1997 · Blue, Frank, Schoonover
693 So. 2d 629; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3088; 1997 WL 148789 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pearson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of Felipe James Pearson’s probation and the sentence imposed. We remand with directions to the trial court to enter a written order specifying that Pearson violated condition five of his probation. See Dietz v. State, 534 So.2d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Pearson’s presence is not required.

Affirmed but remanded for entry of written order.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑