Poyner v. Smith
Poyner v. Smith
693 So. 2d 636; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326; 1997 WL 186290
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Poyner v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
We agree with appellant that the lower court erred in not making the ordered child support reduction retroactive to the date of filing the petition. See McGee-Manis v. Manis, 657 So.2d 78 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), Witcher v. Petty, 534 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). However, we have no sufficient basis to reverse the amount of reduction determined by the lower court and otherwise affirm.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.