Sanchez v. State
Sanchez v. State
693 So. 2d 678
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Sanchez v. State
Opinion of the Court
We find, as the State properly concedes, that the trial court erred by sentencing the defendant, Guillermo Sanchez, to a three-year minimum mandatory term for the use of a firearm to run consecutively to the minimum mandatory terms imposed pursuant to the habitual violent offender statute. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing consistent with Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 1995).
The defendant’s remaining points lack merit.
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.