Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

System One Information Management, L.L.C. v. Incentive Connection Travel, Inc.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 16, 1997 · Barkdull, Cope, Green

693 So. 2d 1092; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5588; 1997 WL 269196 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bieda v. Bieda (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the entry of a temporary injunction and the order denying a motion to dissolve same. See Daoud v. City of Miami Beach, 145 Fla. 449,199 So. 582 (1941); Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). This affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the appellant (defendant in the trial court) seeking an increase in the amount of the injunction bond.1 See Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Dev. Corp., 544 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 1989).

Affirmed without prejudice.

. The original amount of the bond was fixed ex parte and no adequate opportunity to contest the reasonableness of the amount of the bond has been accorded the defendant in the trial court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.