Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Johnson v. Ocala Geriatric Center

Johnson v. Ocala Geriatric Center
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 14, 1997 · Barfield, Benton, Ervin
695 So. 2d 802; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5126; 1997 WL 244739 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Johnson v. Ocala Geriatric Center

Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, Chief Judge.

In this otherwise frivolous appeal of the amount of attorney fees awarded in a workers’ compensation case, we found this observation by the judge of compensation claims (JCC), which we commend to the bench and bar involved in such litigation:

In addition to [consideration of the statutory factors found in section 440.34(1) ], this court has considered the action of the employer/servicing agent throughout the course of this litigation. If concessions and similar steps by employers and carriers to shorten [the] litigation process are not taken into consideration when fees are determined, then the message sent is that once a claimant is represented by counsel, each side should behave in a thoroughly adversarial manner without regard for the needs of the injured employee, or the employer, or the system. In this case, the employer/servicing agent resolved (quite appropriately I would add) the issues before trial and did so without the need for *803any formal discovery beyond the deposition of the claimant.

The JCC’s order is AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.