Perez v. State
Perez v. State
695 So. 2d 851; 1997 WL 330439
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Perez v. State
Opinion of the Court
Corrected Opinion
On motion for clarification, the previous opinion of this court filed April 16, 1997, is vacated and withdrawn, and the corrected opinion is substituted.
As the State properly concedes, because the defendant’s prosecutions for armed burglary and grand theft were not commenced within the appropriate statute of limitations period, the judgments and sentences for these counts must be vacated. Maguire v. State, 453 So.2d 438, 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
The remaining point raised by the defendant lacks merit. Therefore, the defendant’s remaining convictions are affirmed.
Affirmed, in part; vacated, in part, and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.