Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Byrd v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 2, 1997 · Mickle, Padovano, Webster

695 So. 2d 1310; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7575; 1997 WL 361414 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Harris v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Michael Byrd, the defendant, appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his postconviction motion under rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The order recites that the defendant’s claims are conclusively refuted by attached portions of the record, but the portions of the record to which the court referred were not attached. Because the defendant has asserted a facially sufficient claim, the trial court erred in summarily denying the motion. Fla.R.CrimJP. 3.850(d). We reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively refute appellant’s claims or an evidentiary *1311hearing. Hall v. State, 608 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Wells v. State, 598 So.2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Oehling v. State, 659 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Reversed and remanded.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.