Chicago Title Insurance v. Hollander

Florida District Courts of Appeal July 9, 1997

Chicago Title Insurance v. Hollander, 696 So. 2d 1279 (1997)

1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7763; 1997 WL 375087

Cope, Goderich, Schwartz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jacobson v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc., 636 So.2d 120 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); 3M Elec. Corp. v. Vigoa, 443 So.2d 111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 447 So.2d 888 (Fla. 1984).

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH, J., concur.

Dissenting Opinion

COPE, Judge,

dissenting.

In my view there is no contractual or statutory basis for appellee buyers to recover attorney’s fees from appellant escrow agent.

Reference

Full Case Name: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Milton B. HOLLANDER
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published