Chicago Title Insurance v. Hollander
Chicago Title Insurance v. Hollander
696 So. 2d 1279; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7763; 1997 WL 375087
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Chicago Title Insurance v. Hollander
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Jacobson v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc., 636 So.2d 120 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); 3M Elec. Corp. v. Vigoa, 443 So.2d 111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 447 So.2d 888 (Fla. 1984).
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
In my view there is no contractual or statutory basis for appellee buyers to recover attorney’s fees from appellant escrow agent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.