Gusman v. Morris
Gusman v. Morris
697 So. 2d 887; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183; 1997 WL 345992
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gusman v. Morris
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, J., concur.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
With respect to the condominium, the factual findings of the trial court are self-contradictory and are not supported by competent substantial evidence. Appellant is entitled to relief with respect to that property.
With regard to the bonds entrusted to appellee Cecily Morris for the benefit of the decedent for her lifetime, and thereafter for the benefit of appellant and appellee, plainly appellee was a fiduciary and the trial court erred as a matter of law in stating otherwise. An accounting is called for.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.