Russell v. State
Russell v. State
697 So. 2d 924; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8422; 1997 WL 408713
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Russell v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences but reverse the written sentence insofar as it does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement that all three sentences are to run concurrently. The sentence should be corrected on remand to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement.
Convictions and sentences affirmed as orally pronounced; reversed and remanded for correction of written sentence.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.