Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Russell v. State

Russell v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 23, 1997 · Lazzara, Patterson, Schoonover
697 So. 2d 924; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8422; 1997 WL 408713 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Russell v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences but reverse the written sentence insofar as it does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement that all three sentences are to run concurrently. The sentence should be corrected on remand to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

Convictions and sentences affirmed as orally pronounced; reversed and remanded for correction of written sentence.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.