Koy v. State
Koy v. State
697 So. 2d 936; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8597; 1997 WL 423091
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Koy v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, but strike that portion of condition 8 of the probation order which requires appellant to pay for testing. See Curry v. State, 682 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 1996); Diaz v. State, 691 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.