Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Mays v. State

Mays v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 22, 1997 · Antoon, Dauksch, Peterson
697 So. 2d 1320; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9713; 1997 WL 484680 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Mays v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for relief under rule 3.800(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure on the basis that the motion was successive. The instant motion alleged that the defendant’s habitual offender sentence was illegal. This same issue was raised in the defendant’s earlier 3.800(a) motion, the denial of which was affirmed by this court in Mays v. State, 687 So.2d 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑