Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. D & A Accounting & Consulting Corp.

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. D & A Accounting & Consulting Corp.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 10, 1997 · Glickstein, Klein, Stevenson
698 So. 2d 935; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10268; 1997 WL 559440 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. D & A Accounting & Consulting Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We treat the petition for certiorari as a notice of appeal from a final order in a bill of discovery.

It was incumbent upon the trial court to determine if the trade secret privilege exists, and whether the questions asked and objected to even invaded that privilege. See Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Eddings, 673 So.2d 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

It was not necessary for appellant to sue for damages prior to assertion of the bill for discovery. See Adventist Health Sys. Sunbelt, Inc. v. Hegwood, 569 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to proceed in accordance herewith.

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.