Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Kreiser Construction, Inc. v. Trafford

Kreiser Construction, Inc. v. Trafford
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 11, 1997 · Barkdull, Jorgenson, Sorondo
699 So. 2d 251; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6257; 1997 WL 311566 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Kreiser Construction, Inc. v. Trafford

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court striking pleadings for failure of a party to secure new counsel after original counsel withdrew. Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1990).

We do find error (which was conceded by the appellee) in the trial court, non-jury, fixing the amount of damages after a default was entered and a jury trial had been demanded. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.430; Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1990); Ulrich v. Berton, 661 So.2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Therefore, the final judgment is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for a jury trial on the amount of damages with proper notice accorded to all parties.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.