Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Gagger v. State

Gagger v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 26, 1997 · Antoon, Griffin, Peterson
699 So. 2d 347; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10840; 1997 WL 594124 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Gagger v. State

Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Curtis Gagger, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence. On November 15, 1993, defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender to seven years incarceration in Case No. 93-302 for sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine, concurrent with three and one-haif years incarceration for possession of cocaine in Case No. 93-242. Defendant claims that he was improperly sentenced as a habitual felony offender since his convictions were for drug offenses excluded from the operation of the habitual offender statute. Section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1993), does not permit habitualization when both the felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced and one of the two prior felony convictions is a violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes, relating to the purchase or possession of a controlled substance.

The lower court entered a cogent order explaining that the effective date of section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1993), was June 17, 1993. See Ch. 93-406, §§ 2, 44, Laws of Fla. The underlying offenses were committed in Case No. 93-242 on January *34828, 1993, and in Case No. 93-302 on December 16, 1992. The statute in effect at the time defendant committed his crimes is controlling, and such statute did not contain the exclusion provision. See Bond v. State, 675 So.2d 184 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 684 So.2d 1350 (Fla. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.