Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr., P.A. v. Barth

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 24, 1997 · Goderich, Schwartz, Sorondo

699 So. 2d 795; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10727; 1997 WL 586775 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

East Avenue, LLC v. Insignia Bank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Molina v. Watkins (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellee’s response, the purported final judgment under review is summarily reversed pursuant to *796Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(b), and the cause is remanded for entry of an order of the type set out in Del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy, Inc., 512 So.2d 315, 319 n. 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).1 See Martinez v. Marin, 700 So.2d 439 (1997) and cases cited; Miami Columbus, Inc. v. Ramlawi, 687 So.2d 1378, 1381 n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla. 1997).

Reversed.

. We now address only the form of the order below; the merits of the underlying ruling will be considered only on appeal from a properly entered final judgment or a non-final order reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.