Branham v. State
Branham v. State
699 So. 2d 809; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10735; 1997 WL 590073
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Branham v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant challenges an order by which his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), was denied. We affirm because appellant did not raise a claim cognizable under 3.800(a). King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1996); Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1995); Baldwin v. State, 679 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.