Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Neil v. State

Neil v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 17, 1997 · Antoon, Harris, Sharp
699 So. 2d 1392; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11613; 1997 WL 665057 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Neil v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

We grant the motion for clarification on the issue of Neil’s entitlement to credit for time served, in the event this issue might be relevant in his anticipated 3.850 motion. A defendant is entitled to credit for time served on community control during the pendency of his suspended sentence. Norton v. State, 691 So.2d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), Warrington v. State, 660 So.2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Motion for Clarification GRANTED.

W. SHARP, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑