McDonald v. State
McDonald v. State
700 So. 2d 85; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10852; 1997 WL 594048
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
McDonald v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm Mr. McDonald’s convictions and sentences for trespass, burglary, and petit theft. Because the trial court erred in failing to give Mr. McDonald notice that he could object to the amount of the public defender’s fee, on remand Mr. McDonald shall have thirty days front the date of mandate in which to file objections to the amount of the lien. See Smith v. State, 694 So.2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA1997).
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.