Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Ridgeway v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 7, 1997 · Barfield, Benton, Ervin

700 So. 2d 100; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11445; 1997 WL 611683 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Ridgeway v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Carl Ridgeway challenges an order by which his motion, pursuant to Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, was summarily denied. Appellant’s motion to allow credit for jail time is facially insufficient. See Wiggins v. State, 654 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Thomas v. State, 634 So.2d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to appellant filing a timely motion *101that comports with the requirements of Rule 3.850(e).

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.