Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Armadeni v. Tejedo

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 24, 1997 · Cope, Gersten, Shevin

700 So. 2d 416; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10720; 1997 WL 587053 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Valk v. JEM DISTRIBUTORS OF TAMPA BAY (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to the date the appellant knew or should have known of the existence of the fraudulent concealment action, and thus summary judgment is precluded. See Nardone v. Reynolds, 333 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1976); Brugiere v. Credit Commerciale France, 679 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Grossman v. Greenberg, 619 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1993).

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.