Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 12, 1997 · No. 97-364 · Gersten, Schwartz, Shevin

701 So. 2d 126; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12734; 1997 WL 699731 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sorocka v. Severe (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina Mejer-Kondla, appeals an order compelling settlement with appel-lees, Douglas Centre, Inc. and Eagleton Kathe Property, Co. We reverse, because the trial court improperly found a settlement agreement when there remained material differences regarding the essential elements of the proposed agreement. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Estate of Hernandez, 591 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Theocles v. Lytras, 518 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); *127Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc., 422 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.