Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc., 701 So. 2d 126 (1997)
1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12734; 1997 WL 699731
Gersten, Schwartz, Shevin

Mejer-Kondla v. Douglas Centre, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Emelina Mejer-Kondla, appeals an order compelling settlement with appel-lees, Douglas Centre, Inc. and Eagleton Kathe Property, Co. We reverse, because the trial court improperly found a settlement agreement when there remained material differences regarding the essential elements of the proposed agreement. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 1985); Metropolitan Dade County v. Estate of Hernandez, 591 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Theocles v. Lytras, 518 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); *127Gaines v. Nortrust Realty Management, Inc., 422 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
Emelina MEJER-KONDLA v. DOUGLAS CENTRE, INC. and Eagleton Kathe Property Co.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published