Naidus v. State
Naidus v. State
702 So. 2d 1324; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13312; 1997 WL 731484
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Naidus v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. We remand to the trial court with directions to either strike the imposition of restitution, or to grant appellant an eviden-tiary hearing to determine ability to pay. See Filmare v. State, 656 So.2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.