Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1997

Brantley v. State

Brantley v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 16, 1997 · Cope, Nesbitt, Schwartz
708 So. 2d 598; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3933; 1997 WL 180235 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Brantley v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because the asserted errors in the appellant’s guidelines scoresheet and sentence are not readily ascertainable from the face of the record and are therefore not cognizable in this Rule 3.800(a) proceeding,1 State v. Montague, 682 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 1996); McCalister v. State, 682 So.2d 556 (Fla. 1996), approving McCalister v. State, 664 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1995); Holland v. State, 672 So.2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), review denied, 678 So.2d 338 (Fla. 1996), the order below denying relief is

Affirmed.

. Any motion asserted under Rule 3.850 is barred as untimely.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑